Have you heard of Shapr3D? If not, you should take notice immediately because it’s one of the most innovative ways to 3D design and 3D model ever created! We are going to talk about Shapr3D VS Autodesk Fusion 360: what’s the difference and how does Shapr3D compare to Fusion 360? Let’s take a look at each program and find out what makes each unique. We’ll see why you might want to consider using Shapr3D over Fusion 360 or vice versa!
What is Shapr3D?
A 3D modeling platform that can be used on Windows and Mac. The price of the software ranges from $15 to $79 based on if you want extra features, one thing is for sure, it’s cheap. There is a free trial available so users can decide whether they want to pay for additional functionality.
The maximum file size supported by Shapr3D is 16 Gb which should be more than enough for most applications. One advantage of using Shapr3D over other similar products is that it has built-in support for importing/exporting files into other formats such as .stl, .obj, and .dae (Collada).
This means users don’t have to export their models from one program to another. Another good feature about Shapr3D is that there are no limits on how many projects or parts you can have open at once.
What is Autodesk Fusion 360?
Design software for 3D modeling, including 2D design, 3D printing, and 3d rendering. There are some very powerful features in Fusion360 such as Inventor Publisher which is a full CAD assembly feature with links to multiple files. The link can take a while to render if it’s a complex model.
I like to use Fusion360 because of its easy integration with Autodesk Inventor. I can easily import my designs from Autodesk Inventor into Fusion360 without having to redraw everything on another program. It’s also great for people who have experience using AutoCAD or Solidworks because there are similar tools in Fusion that they will be familiar with using.
Difference between Shapr3D and Autodesk Fusion 360
Shapr3D is free software that allows you to create your 3D models from 2D images. You can use this tool to make 3D models of anything you want, whether it’s a car, house, or even a human being!
Autodesk Fusion 360 is a paid software that allows you to design 3D models using 2D images. This software is used by professionals who need to design objects that are complex and require high precision.
Workflow: Shapr3D vs. Autodesk Fusion 360
This is where Shapr3D shines. It’s a drag-and-drop CAD program designed to make designing 3D models as easy as possible and to encourage more people to adopt and learn how to use 3D modeling software. As such, it’s considerably easier for beginners and casual users, who won’t have learned every little button and command shortcut available.
This makes learning curves shorter in time overall. For example, if you want to extrude an object with Fusion 360, you need to go through quite a few steps; first, you need to select what object you want to extrude (if there are multiple objects selected), then click on Extrude Body from your menu bar.
The user interface: Shapr3D vs. Autodesk Fusion 360
The biggest difference between Shaper and Fusion is in their user interface. If you use products by 3DS Max, Maya, or Blender to design your models, then you’ll be quite comfortable with how Shaper works. The GUI uses some of the same terminologies for panels and tools, making it simple to dive into using Shaper if you’re familiar with any of those programs.
The 3D modeling tools: Shapr3D vs. Autodesk Fusion 360
Let’s first talk about what they do. Fusion360 is much more of a professional tool, like 3ds Max or Maya. Shapr3D is geared toward getting people into modeling and working with 3d graphics. Both have tutorials that walk you through making things, but Shapr3D has them all in video format whereas Fusion has written ones.
Read More: VLC Media Player vs. K-Lite Codec Pack: What’s the Difference?
Pros & Cons: Shapr3D vs. Autodesk Fusion 360
While Shapr3D and Autodesk’s FUSION 360 are similar in scope, they have different value propositions. There is a lot to be said for both of these toolsets, and which one you ultimately use will depend on your specific needs. However, if you’re looking to learn more about each program, keep reading!
Conclusion
At first glance, it’s easy to be confused by both programs. They each feature intuitive workflows, a clean interface, and helpful online communities. But under their high-tech exteriors, there are fundamental differences that shape how each program is used in a professional setting. If you plan on designing new products in a freelance capacity or you simply want to tinker with new technology at home, both programs have great perks that can help make your design process more streamlined and enjoyable.